Quote psychostring="psychostring"After so many disappointments in the past my head is telling me Marc Green will get back in.
My heart wants it to be someone like Mr Seabrook or Mr Park Avenue with lots of money and someone like the former cronulla guy helping them to run it properly. I don't think I'd be disappointed if the Koukash family were successful either simply from a financial perspective.
My bet falls somewhere in the middle and I'm going for Richard Lamb.
I'd be pretty underwhelmed with this but I think it is probably a more realistic outcome than the white knight with a pot of cash scenario. Although some of the tweets from Ross Heppenstall today do make me wonder given he is normally ridiculously negative.
Who knows, maybe it'll be third time lucky for the Bulls. As a set of fans I think we've had a long enough period of suffering now. Surely the upward trend has to start soon.'"
Given this morning's T&A article quoting 3 parties in the running, all with "rugby experience" then Richard lamb doesn't look a bad shout.
One thing I'd like to ask though - given Lamb is clearly a successful businessman - why all the negativity by some members on here? Can somebody actually point me to some hard and fast evidence that he is a "chancer with no money" as i have seen quoted by some.
And don't point out his inability to show proof of funds last time round - the RFL gave him 24 hours knowing full well his accountant was on holiday and it would be impossible get the details. They had been having discussions for weeks and the RFL never made any mention of wanting to see any of his accounts untill the 11th hour - they knew he wouldn't be able to do it - so that is not evidence that he didn't actually have the funds in place. The Administrator at the time was clearly happy with his bid.
