And not for the first time.







TBH that's probably the best sort of Hull fan to be at the moment.

I agree with you a lot but seen as though you refused to send me any dirty pics of you I have stopped heaping praise on you in public

Which ever way you put it, spelt incorrectly or correctly, You are! Do us all a favour and change the record.

She may well have, I'm not saying she has no point at all, but it does not mean she has to go on about it =green[size=150ALL[/size the time.

TBF, she has precious little else to go on about

Not that dull, dull is the position Salford find themselves in at present, along with other clubs that are struggling to compete. It's a well known fact that Rovers sacrificed their youth policy, which was well respected for a lower league club a few years back, to assist them with their plan to get into Super League, which they managed to do as you well know.



Rovers have over the last couple of seasons have progressed in the top division, and at the same time we've progressed at youth levels also. Every club has it's own policy on it's youth development, Salford's is to bring in players at an early age as your stats suggest, but yet it's also encouraged by the state Salford find themselves in, with little money to spend on new players, Mcrae's own words, and a reliance on youth to help out.



Hull have a policy of telling the world they have a very good crop of youngsters coming through, yet constantly look to Australia and New Zealand to recruit players, what does this say to the young players looking to step up into the first team?



Now although some might argue that Rovers have the wrong kind of approach, I can only suggest the stats point to it working in our favour, the first team are going well in the Super League, the youth teams are improving.

So untrue. I could talk about FC's unavailable players if you like.

Please do.....is it the coach's fault, the physios fault or just the fact that signing older players invariably means more injuries ?

What a ridiculous point. For starters we have quota spots free and only 4 overseas players to pick from, and of those we are selecting Maloney over Moa. Every year we bring through players into the first team. Houghton and Briscoe broke into the first team last year, Burnett this. I would suggest the message to our young players is that if they are included in the first team squad, they have a reasonable chance of actually playing a SL game.











Rovers do have the right approach as long as the RFL keep backtracking on overseas qualification rules. Still disappointing that, going into your 4th SL season you've only got 1 player brought through the ranks in that time to show for it.

All of the above, although you do know the average age of FC's squad is lower than Rovers, don't you?

Or as someone pointed out on their board:





MrPhilb wrote: I thought you was missing 12 players?





only if you listen to Agar, Rule's and Mrs Baristas excuses.

I think you'll find this was and is due to necessity rather than policy