I didn't wish to be. As I said, I think he's a good player. He's just not got that extra something to lift him beyond good. On the other thread, you said yourself that you're not totally convinced he's worth retaining, so you must agree to an large extent, no?







I haven't mentioned him taking wrong options, though. I don't think he has particularly. I just think he's good in defence (the Washbrook incident aside), ok in attack without pulling up trees, and his kicking game is a bit hit and miss. He's undoubtedly an improvement on having better halfbacks that only play half as many games, but I'm not convinced that'll be enough. I like a halfback who can create something from nothing every once in a while. Maybe if we have someone like that playing alongside him, things will look up.







Depends who they're playing alongside, I suppose. I think Myler gets a lot of unwarranted criticism, too.

I don't rate Myler at all but oddly I actually think he would probably be a good partner for Seymour. Not that I would want him.

My stance has always been that 'good' is enough in one of your halfbacks. The reason I wouldn't definitely say I'd keep him is because I want to see him with decent partner first. ATM I don't have a problem with him and wouldn't be looking to get rid.







I strongly agree with the last 2 sentences.







I just think Myler is pants. If he wasn't in such a good side where he can feed off the breaks of others I don't see what he has to offer.

seymour for me has stood out in the last few weeks hes been our only point of attack and should not have to do it himself we have horne and ellis and neither of them are good enough to take us further it gets to hands and is to predictable quicker hands and we would of scored atleast 2 more tries against st helens and wakey and ultimatly won the games the play slows down everytime it gets to horne or ellis

id take chase in a heartbeat quick hands a step and fast and a good short kicking game not as good as benji but hes superleagues benji and gentle would love having him here imo

He seems to have a habit of getting himself into the right positions to feed off the breaks of others, though. That's what a good half back should do. There were a couple of instances yesterday where we made half breaks and better backing up might have resulted in something more than the move simply breaking down. It's probably fruitless comparing him to Seymour, however, as their styles are wildly differing. Wire are fortunate to have Briers and Monaghan in the same side, both of whom are more creative than anyone we have. If Myler is successful in feeding off that creativity, he's doing his job, IMO.

Think he's done quite well, his kicking game is inconsistent but overall have being impressed. needs a regular partner with him and full back joining the line.

It is one of the things a good half back should do, just as it’s one of the things any good fullback, 3/4, and hooker should do. I think it’s a strange inconsistency to say you want a halfback to be able to create something out of nothing and then hold Myler up as offering more than Seymour, as I personally have only ever really seen him feed off the work/mistakes of others. He ‘creates’ very little, but he does exploit very well.

I don't think he'd be any better than Seymour at the creative side, don't get me wrong. I just think that the other aspects of his attacking game (his running and backing up) are a little better. In truth, neither would be the answer as the main playmaker. We need someone else for that. No inconsistencies here.

Useless having a 7 who can't play when his stand off partner isn't available isn't it

seymour has still outplayed dobson on both games this season.

I think where we disagree is that you don't think Myler's any better than Seymour creatively, whereas I don't think he's even as good. Not even close, really.

He is the best scrum half we have had for several years. I'm not counting Dykes because he was so rarely fit.