You can now do this and get away with a formal caution, and the player you gauged also gets the same caution



What a farce

This.

Bent.

Are youa ware of the difference between a gauge and a gouge?

I thought the disciplinary panel sat tomorrow ?

It looks that way, doesn't it? How a player can attempt to put his fingers into the eyes of an opponent and face no sterner action than a strongly-worded letter is quite baffling.

Ah just seen my question answered

I'll wait until I see the detailed judgement before venting my spleen. There is the off-chance that the footage supplied to the video panel didn't include an angle that showed the act clearly enough, as I don't think they're allowed to use Sky footage and rely on the club's camera feed only.

That, in itself, is fooking ridiculous. The Sky footage is evidence - usually the best evidence - and shouldn't be excluded.

Looks like that Leeds shirt has done the job again. Its like Batfink's wings.

Completely. Shocking. Or not, because it's Leeds.

There's nothing in the [url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/~rflmedia/docs/On%20Field%20Compliance%20Sentencing%20Guidelines%202012%20-%20Final.pdfguidelines[/url that would suggest that and to be honest, I can't believe the RFL would leave themselves open to the possibility of litigation by refusing to accept readily available evidence.