Fc's attaire for away games next year, no club suits allowed.

Not sure I agree with that!



Whilst the game was close Eastmond showed that he is a runner and doesnt have the passing or kicking game required to win the big games....yet!

What a surprise







Eastmond wasn't the reason Saints got beaten today.

He wasnt the reason but Saints uncharacteristically blew a lot of chances.



Their kicking game was awful.

he looked like lee langman



pryce to centre, eastmond to 6 and sign a new scrum half if i were saints

Saints were made to look poor by a very committed, well drilled and physical Huddersfield side. Their work around the ruck was exceptional and they continually turned Saints over when coming out of their back end so they could get no momentum.



If you seriously think Long would have that much difference then imo you're in for a big disappointment next season.

dont agree.saints didnt get beat in the forewards,it was the lack of guile and experience,especially near the line.saints will miss long next year,we will benefit.

Mate they got battered in the forwards. Graham was the only one competing he was virtually carrying the Saints pack. Pryce wouldn't have been so ineffective if Saints pack had been competetive.



I guess some people only see what they want to see, so lets agree to disagree

Well what a suprise.



Committed and physical Huddersfield might have been but perhaps you might remind us how many errors they made in their own half. How many sets, including repeat sets, did Saints fail to convert when within striking distance of Hudd's line?



Of course a top class experienced scrum half wouldn't have made a difference. Well not one that was moving to Hull anyway.

Long only plays well when his forwards dominate. Even Dobson played him off the park earlier in the year...why???.....



I'll let you decide