So would I.



I'm yet to be convinced Carlos is the answer at six. That's not to say he's been particularly poor there, or that he won't come good, just that I don't feel he's shown enough yet to prove he's the six we need.



As some have pointed out, the nature of the sport means that halfbacks will drift in and out of matches due to the ebb & flow of a game - sides with momentum and on top of the opposition will allow a half to shine. If you're playing chunks of a game in your own 30/40m, you'll rarely use the half & they can [iappear[/i to go missing. I wouldn't hold this against him to be honest.

Why not give Abdull another go. He's earnt the right, been MOM in the last 4 U23s games I think. We are very quick to drop these lads, both him and Logan were quickly discarded, Yeamo has rightly kept Logan out but now Carlos is injured, Pryce out of favour, we should play Abdull.

^^^ THIS ^^^

"This"^^^^^^

I would go along with that. He was made the scapegoat for Widnes hammering when more experienced players were lucky not to be dropped.

you are probably correct but the lad wasnt fit enough so didnt do himself any favours.

if he gets himself into real shape and increase his fitness levels he could also add a bit more pace to his game.

I think Pryce will play against HKR but i wont be concerned if Abdul starts.

Both might start

Abdull did well against Warrington at home. He offers something different to the other halves we have so i would play him

Pryce at 7, Abdull at 6 this week!!!

not a chance of leaving Sneyd out hes not injured he only had cramp at the end of the Leeds game

I can't see Radford not playing a fit Pryce with Tuimavave injured. And Washy's versatility more or less guarantees him the fourth bench spot. Unless he goes with only two bigger forwards and Washy, Abdul will probably miss out.

[urlhttp://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/hull-fc-carlos-tuimavave-injury-extent-revealed/story-29503070-detail/story.html[/urlOut for 4 weeks.