well said, hes not even here and where moaning about him, he my come here and be brilliant, who knows??? if/when he signs, lets give the kid a chance

if its a 1 year deal, its a risk i'd like us to take

I agree.



Why sign a backup for Long, when allegedly he has no kicking game.



If Long gets injured, we'd be back to square one.



If Rovelli is non quota, fine. - he'd be ok at 6 or 9. - but we still need a 7- IMHO.

He's better than nothing, agreed, and very likely better than Washy, agreed. I'm not going on a newspaper report, just comments from people who've seen him play. As an example, the Roosters messageboard was wearing a virtual black armband when Fitz left, and people who see players week in week out sometimes have a more informed opinion than I do, as I've never seen him play.



He is maybe as good as we could have got for a short term sticking plaster. But let's think about 2012. Rumours are Horne may retire and Long will be 35. We've no obvious HB coming through the academy who'll be a first choice HB then. To me, Briggs under the guidance of Long for a year would have been a better option, or better still Robinson (although his fee would probably be prohibitive). He might end up being fine, but this is an opportunity to use Long to bring someone through that's nearly ready IMO.

Been told by a club source, we are in for a big prop from Oz? Anyone fancy a guess?

Shillington according to some people

Why another prop from Oz?

Maybe the club feel that Nicklas and Williams are the best long term option, and signing a top 7 & 6 for 2012,13 & 14 is the way to bring these 2 on. Therefore, in the short term, Rovelli is the best cover we can get.

Who's to say Long won't be here after 2011 in a coaching capacity anyway?

Stop it now. Unnecessary teasing.

So you're basically writing the lad off before he even gets over here, if he is too. You say he has no kicking game apparently so you've either not seen him or hardly seen him play? I'd wait until we see him play for us before even attempting to make a judgement before he arrives. He may be crap, he may be excellent and be here for many years, no one knows let's give it a chance. Plus I'd say out recruitment of Calderwood and Cusack for Sharp and Westerman is a bit more than good.

I specifically asked Sheldon the kicking game question as he is in Australia and watches a lot of NRL and he said Rovelli's kicking game is "very average". Believe me, I'd like nothing more than for him to rip it up over here. But IMO it's not a signing to get giddy about - this is more Todd Byrne (who I also liked BTW) than Craig Fitzgibbon and with a reasonable possibility that both our halves may not be here in 2012, I think it's fair to question whether we could have done better from a long term planning perspective.TBF to the club, we're trying (Myler, Briggs etc) and if this is all that's available, fine.

I've never seen Grant Rovelli play - indeed I'd never heard of him until a few weeks ago. However given that this would almost certainly be a Treisteresque short term deal I'd be OK with his signing. I don't imagine there are too many imports willing to agree a one year deal.



If we are targeting a high profile half back for 2012 then Rovelli - with around 100 NRL appearances and a point to prove - for one year as cover is fine with me.