Jake the Peg:
Pretty terrible performance from the off. The first set they marched easily up the field which is a good indicator.
Way too many errors and missed tackles to be competitive and it looked like a game too far for our patched up side, we really are missing 2 decent (proper) 2nd rowers.
Having said all that, they were fortunate to be awarded 2 tries which had gone up as no try and I also thought the field one looked like an obstruction but I've not watched it back.
Worst part of the game for me was that period in the 2nd half at 26 12 when we had god knows how many sets in their 20 and never looked like troubling them.
Disappointing overall but we'd all have taken 4th after 9 rounds before the season started.
Hopefully some easier home games to come
Agree with all this and with my b&w glasses on I would question at least a couple of their tries.
Not sure on ruling but if an attacker is laid on a defender who is in touch does that not mean the attacker is in touch? But that aside if it takes that long to prove the ref was wrong then it isn?t an obvious error which is what the vr is for?
I thought the Wardle try was an obstruction and how can Thaler claim that the defender (Briscoe) initiated the contact when Nsemba was in his way and he just ran into him. That was what happened in the earlier try and no problem with that one.
We were poor though and made some bad errors and lost composure.
A good lesson learned hopefully?