Ah, you edited it before I replied......



Who gave any poster any credibility?

What did I say to give the impression I was impressed?



I as much idea of what is actually happening/what happened as 99% of the people on here, including most probably you - we only know what we are allowed to know. I don't know if investors were interested in investing or not, but you seemed to be suggesting that becuase they hadn't come forward since the club was up for grabs and Ted had gone that they hadn't actually been interested and the poster had made it up.



Now the poster may well have made it up, I don't know. But your argument (if i was interpriting it right) doesnt make it so in my opinion.

I'm not offended, it's you who makes yourself look silly with talk of high horses and teds ar*e.



What you are unable to grasp is that neither I nor TRB have defended Ted Richardson. Why would I, I don't have shares in him, I just don't know the full facts yet. What irks you I fear is some of us won't join thee lynch mob no matter how much you or others shout and abuse.

In classic mob paranoia style your only reaction is to accuse the doubters of being heretics against the knew belief, burn the witches that kind of thing.



I won't be told what to think for now thanks, I'd rather wait and see. If I'm not part of the gang so what, if I think the accusations on here against anyone are unfair or unfounded I'll say so. It's a free forum, it works both ways.

absolute claptrap!!

i dont care who thinks what, this issue came about because YOU wouldnt accept what i was saying without me having to qualify everything i said with some kind of fact, which for your amusement i did, you chose not to give me the same consideration.

In my opinion it is you who is intollerant of others views, as you attempt to derail anything anyone says that you do not agree with your childish primary school call to "prove it".

So just to clarify.



Someone could be right,someone could be wrong.

Everyone could be right in some way or everyone could be wrong in another.

QED.



I have respect for comments that both posters write.



If you really cant agree ,why not just agree to disagree.

Alternatively meet up before the Salford game and have a fight to the death(may do the attendance figures for that match a world of good)



But for God sake give it a rest!!!!!!!!!!!

Too true!

Beat me too it.

I fundamentally disagree with the suggestion that we should 'forget the past'; rather, we should examine it, study it, understand it, learn from it and above all, make sure it never happens again.



Forgetting the past is a very dangerous habit; if you do, history will inevitably repeat itself.

Pre-match entertainment of the highest order!

Who gives a Sh*t now. Lets just get back to playing the game.

I totaly agree agree, you should learn from it and use it to move forward, the other side of it is you have to move on and away from it other wise you end up going around in cirlcles.

Not bothered about the Richardson or what happened in the past it is time to move on......