www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... amily.html



[iThe editorial in the latest edition of Red Issue claims that, ‘The chants all tell how the Glazers are gonna (sic) die, yet in reality they’re free to walk out of the ground unchallenged. Until that changes, nothing will. [/i



[iRather than MUST frittering away £65,000 on some American lobbying agency, that sort of money would be better spent on flying some passionate anti-Glazer supporters to Florida to show Joel (Glazer) & Co the strength of Reds’ feeling in person.’ [/i



I can't quite see where that says they are advocating physical intimidation but I do agree that it hints at a split between the United fans wanting rid of the Glazers. Thoughts?



Liverpool on the other hand:



[iOther supporters, though, have taken direct action against Hicks and Gillett, too, including the launch of a viral email sent to several executives at RBS, the club’s bankers. [/i



Fairly embarrassing TBH.

www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... amily.html



[iThe editorial in the latest edition of Red Issue claims that, ‘The chants all tell how the Glazers are gonna (sic) die, yet in reality they’re free to walk out of the ground unchallenged. Until that changes, nothing will. [/i



[iRather than MUST frittering away £65,000 on some American lobbying agency, that sort of money would be better spent on flying some passionate anti-Glazer supporters to Florida to show Joel (Glazer) & Co the strength of Reds’ feeling in person.’ [/i



I can't quite see where that says they are advocating physical intimidation but I do agree that it hints at a split between the United fans wanting rid of the Glazers. Thoughts?



Liverpool on the other hand:



[iOther supporters, though, have taken direct action against Hicks and Gillett, too, including the launch of a viral email sent to several executives at RBS, the club’s bankers. [/i



Fairly embarrassing TBH.