|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f26/18f261ad9076a26f2070d68f8e747affe95182dd" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 6310 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Any chance they will be in contention for the semi final?
They will both make the side if fit.
Bails will start at 2nd row ahead of joel and lockers will start at loose forward ahead flanagan.
Flanagan will be 18th man with Feca, Fielden, joel and mossop on the bench.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5463 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Tricky Dicky="Tricky Dicky"Any chance they will be in contention for the semi final?
They will both make the side if fit.
Bails will start at 2nd row ahead of joel and lockers will start at loose forward ahead flanagan.
Flanagan will be 18th man with Feca, Fielden, joel and mossop on the bench.'"
Well I agree that, if fit then both should play and I would have it like it is above with Flanagan missing out, however what is key is that they should only play if fully fit, we can't afford to go into that semi with two half fit players.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 18803 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Bailey will return I expect although it'd be harsh on Flanagan because he was outstanding on Friday.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 479 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| With baily and lockers due back from injury soon does anyone think maybe its time to drop fielden and give mossop a run at prop.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Bilko="Bilko"Bailey will return I expect although it'd be harsh on Flanagan because he was outstanding on Friday.'"
yeah i agree think it would be very unfair to drop him
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 332 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| personally i'd drop joel, didn't have the best game on friday, I'd have the same backline, bails and hansen in SR with lockers at loose, mossop, feka, fielden and flanagan(instead of the injured goulding) on the bench
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 6310 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| No definately dont drop fielden.
Its coincidental that since we started going with 5 props we have looked far better in the last few weeks.
A bench of Fielden, Feca, Mosssop and joel against a big wire pack is just what we need. Thtais a very big set of forwards for interchange and one which the opposition would struggle to cope with.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2022 | Jan 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd drop Fielden on his head.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 127 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2015 | Feb 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| personally i'd drop joel, didn't have the best game on friday, I'd have the same backline, bails and hansen in SR with lockers at loose, mossop, feka, fielden and flanagan(instead of the injured goulding) on the bench. i'd drop joel every match!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1348 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Tricky Dicky="Tricky Dicky"No definately dont drop fielden.
Its coincidental that since we started going with 5 props we have looked far better in the last few weeks.
A bench of Fielden, Feca, Mosssop and joel against a big wire pack is just what we need. Thtais a very big set of forwards for interchange and one which the opposition would struggle to cope with.'"
I'd have to say Flanagan would miss out to be honest. I agree with your selection there, the interchange would be Riddell off for Tomkins who will go into the 2nd row with Bailey moving to 3.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3614 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Nov 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd Have a back row of Hansen and Bailey with Lockers at loose, IF FIT. Which is a bit if from what i've heard.Mossop and Flanagan on the bench.
I think that although Joel can be a bit more attacking than others, its not really whats needed for the match. If we can contain there forwards defensively, our backs SHOULD be able to finish the game off.
Therefore i'd go with Flanagan who has performed fantastically well defensively the last 2 games, and hasn't produced the errors which joel has which could be exceedingly costly in a semi final.
All in all a good problem to have!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2785 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2012 | Nov 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I would bring baliey back if goulding is not playing but would we risk lockers in such a big game, we brought him back too early last year and it back fired on us.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3491 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2014 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Bring Bailey in as a straight swap for Goulding and IF OLoughlin is fit for the match then I personally would drop Joel and keep Flanagan based on his merit against Saints.
Only fair IMO, If Lockers is back then we have an attacking backrower back so after Joel had a poor game I think its only reasonable that Flanagan gets his chance again for an almost flawless performance against the best
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 29909 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Given Gouldings injury i think only one player will have to miss out from the backrow last Friday anyway even if both Bailey and Lockers are back.
I think we all know that man would more then likely be Flanagan however unjust.
I doubt Lockers making the game anyway so i think we'll just be looking at Bailey coming back in for Goulding with Flanagan dropping down to the bench.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f26/18f261ad9076a26f2070d68f8e747affe95182dd" alt="" |
|