Agreed. I've only seen the tries on Sky Sports but the second Sammut effort was due to lack of numbers, not an individual error. Granted, Clubb missed a 1-on-1 for the first Sammut try but, again, there was a lack of lateral movement inside him - when anyone is left 1-on-1 it means there's been already been a defensive failure to read the play.

The most pleasing aspect of the game for me was our kicking game. We may actually have an English half-back who can kick the ball to stay in the in-goal area!

We should have won by a bigger margin, and they did bomb a great opportunity to steal the game from us late on.

I did think we looked really great in the spell when Chad went to 9 and Bailey operated at 6 (and that is no disrespect to Andy Ellis who had a fine game). As the combinations settle down I think we'll be better with ball in hand, although I've got to say Dorn's try early in the second half really was a joy.

Great to see KT's go forward - the whole team lifted when he came on. It does annoy me though that we let that lazy, greedy get Sammut over for 2 tries.

Think criticism of Howell unfair. He had a poor game by his standards, but he nade the decisive break for the winning try, and he is a consistent try scorer.



Thought bailey at stand-off looked good, Cad at 7 still doesnt feel right - may be worth giving Mellor a go and spelling Ellis/Randell. would like to see Pyrce given a go - either for 0'C (who has done nothing wrong) or Mellor (who i would put on the bench because he can virtually cover any position on the pitch.



I thought we could and should have won by more - but that is a game we would have lost last season, and the season before - so good on them! We seem to be playing better as a team. Dorn and Gayle are excellent. Ellis and Chad good. Great to have Karl back and for a first game he really went forward well. Ambler, Bailey, Burnett (especially) and Nick K all had moments. Next games are hard, but will give us a realsitic view of where we will be at end of season. If we avoid getting slaughtered by Leeds then i will be more than happy.



I think the crowd was 3000 or so - i think we did shoot ourselves in the foot - but keep winning, keep marketing, get a couple of good cup draws and we may be on our way.



Feel more optomistic than at any time for last 12/15months?

This attendance business really took the shine off for me. Driving home I was jubilant; a win against the odds (hanging on to a two point lead for 20 mins!), joint top of the league and a good performance to boot, and moreover a reasonable attendance for a Crusaders fixture! And then when I get home I check the attendance to see 1700!! There was never ever just 1700 in the ground. As others have said 3000 (or near on) still isn't great but we haven't helped ourselves have we.



Regarding the game I really do like the look of Mike Burnett, and I thought Jamie O'C was excellent. He's had stick on here before but I think that now he is looking the part. Plenty of hard work taking the ball in and a fantastic try saving tackle in the first half. At the very least he's not making it easy for Pryce and Calderwood waiting in the "wings".

Likewise, I can't believe the crowd was 1766; this really bugged me last night.

In light of there being a "new broom" in the house perhaps the question of the difference between "actual" and "official" attendance figures could be raised at the next fan's forum. I think Gus mentioned the resurrection of a fans forum (date tbc) in his statement.



It's bugging me as well !

?!!



Have I missed something? Quality player. Best Crusaders man on the park by a tu'penny bus ride yesterday.



Regarding his second try, although the defence was pretty thin, that penalty should never have been awarded by Child that led to the try. I believe on that occasion it was a blatant interference he adjudged to be a knock-on.

A very gritty Quins performance - and it hasn't been often you could put those words in the same sentence! A very enjoyable game, but I think most people were too cold to cheer too loudly.



Thought other good signs included (all mentioned by others before):



(i) finally, a good kicking game! Consistently turning their fullback around, good job by Gale.

(ii) Burnett seems an elusive runner, and can get offloads away

(iii) O'Callaghan was taking the high balls well generally, can't have been easy with the greasy ball yesterday (there was one near the end which was allowed to bounce when there were around 10 players around it, think they were all knackered)

(iv) nice tight defence on our own line - can't ask for more (except for not dropping it on the first tackle 5m out after having done all the hard work!)



Re Sammut, he does unexpected things and creates uncertainty in the other side with ball in hand - I'd love to have someone like him, lazy or not!

Agree with bikefan re the kicking game. Thought it was perhaps what gave us the win in the final analysis, aside from one kick out on the full.



Good to see young British talent such as Gale and O'Callaghan looking genuine Super League standard players.

Thought Luke Gale did very well, as did Jamie O'Callaghan and Luke Ambler. Very intelligent kicking game from Gale. Do we have a new unwritten rule that you have to be called Luke to score for us this season?

The team look far more "together" this season and it was good to win with such a gritty display.



Agree with all those who claim the attendance was around 3,000. No way was it 1,700.

I'm not going to comment on the game but I thought the crowd was about right, the lowest I have seen for years. It wasn't even half full, that was plain to see from the South Stand.