these 2 clowns never change they are always against wire every 50 50 is against us

with these cretins it is so obvious

i was in corporate hospitality today and a couple of points of interest today

why on earth is smith releasing gaz carvell ? talking to him after the game he does not

want to leave so why release him ?

also what did waterhouse do today compared to benny ?

Agree on Carvell but other than that I think you should lay off the moet and prawn sandwiches. Fans of every club think that Sky hate them, it is part of the RL mentality. Clarkey comes in for all the criticism for 'hating' Warrington yet if you actually listen to him he praises us more than any other pundit I can think of. Stevo is a Dewsbury lad and to suggest that he loves Leeds (as many do) is ridiculous. Several times he said to me last August that he would be cheering for us at Wembley, but don't let common sense get in the way of a good old rant.

I agree, Clarke has been up our backsides since the Cullen era when he used to always go on about how 'on our day' we played as good rugby as Saints.



On Carvell I expect it was salary cap pressures and Bradford being willing to offer him more than us for a 2 year deal but I agree with you I wish he was still here next year and I think most of our fans think the same.

Thing is, he might mention four or five teams during commentary, the minute he mentions Wigan he gets up in arms. Immature really!

dave chisnall broke stevos jaw in 1974 ccsemi at wigan but my mane gripe is gresion 20 hemmings

was told after the game smith does not like him and carvell is so fit he could play on for at least

2 years and have you seen the overseas replacement for him he is pants

Asotasi, I wouldn't call him pants to his face after watching him!

As for Carvell, we wouldn't have givin him a 2yr deal. Although he has hit some form, he has spent quite a bit of the last 2 seasons out with injuries.

Its the direct replacement for Morley were waiting on with abaited breath!!??

Please go easy on Mssrs Hemmings and Stephenson. They'd both been told their dogs had been shot, just when Briers had his moment of madness, hence their lack of enthusiasm for all things Warrington. The fact that they brought this matter up every 2 minutes, was just frustration to the loss of their well loved pooches. The toys also went out of the pram, when Mr Hemmings wanted Paul Wood sent off for a first half shoulder charge



There was also tragedy in the Wells household. Poor Jon had just been informed that his pet parrot "Polly" had escaped the family home, when a window had been left open. This explains his anger, whilst explaining the non legitimacy of Westwood's try under the post, in his half-time analysis.



Mr Clark's Wigan based zoo has been shut down, which explains his tone of voice, whenever Warrington scored. Poor Phil.



It must be remarked that Shaun McRea suffered no such animal tragedies whilst commentating on today's game, although he did say he wanted to eat a couple of wildebeast as a half-time snack

It was that bad yesterday I turned the volume down, and put the radio on.



Then watching the sin tellins Eddie was banging on about Briers. Give it up man.



Must admit rather enjoyed Sam Tomkins talking about the game.

Must admit I actually like the TV version in S Tomkins, it's just the on pitch one I can't stand.

Yesterday was ridiculous, watching the game back they just didn't stop going on about the punch for the whole 80 minutes and Eddie was still going on about it at half time in the other game.

In my experience, every paranoid fan of every club in every sport is convinced the media hate their team and love their biggest rivals. It's not true so get over yourselves.



I don't have Sky and although I stream the odd match online I don't pay attention to what any of them have to say. It's not really very important.

Surely it isn't beyond the techies that, via the red button, we could just hear the noise of the spectators ? I've, for a long time now watched games on Sky with the sound muted. Total silence is preferable to the inane ramblings of the *expert* commentators.