Really? They are not a construction company, more a land owner/developer. They own most of the land bordering the Manchester Ship Canal and Salford Quays as well as stakes on some shopping centres and retail parks - but they don't actually build themselves.

THE head honcho is a Bury lad (with Isle of Man residency for convenience).

What you have to ask yourselves is who is prepared to buy the directors loan accounts. I am sure neither Mr Wilkinson nor any other director would be prepared to just write it off,then again any new investor probably would want to empty the closet. The other option is to let the current company go bump and start afresh debt free. That route of course brings it's own problems with the Rugby league.

www.facebook.com/salfordcityreds?ref=stream Let's hope it's news of very wealthy investors.

www.facebook.com/salfordcityreds?ref=stream Let's hope it's news of very wealthy investors.

www.reds.co.uk/rugby-news/a-mess ... e-chairman It seems that new investors cannot be named just yet!

www.reds.co.uk/rugby-news/a-mess ... e-chairman It seems that new investors cannot be named just yet!

If its as you all say it's in place and done why not just say so I will sit on fence till it happens at the end of day if these owners were interested surely they would have had an interest in keeping players like Marty smith instead of having to rebuild from scratch to prove there are interested rather than sitting on fence and seeing club depleted. Not convinced at all a typical club statement that we get every year

Yeah, the company is more than likely named after the town of Peel in the IOM, which incidentally is a cracking place to visit/live etc, not least due to their 7.5% income tax.

rather like your threats to never go and watch the club again then?

Yeah when my season ticket is up I have had season ticket for over 20 years and just fed up of hearing same rubbish so if new investors were serious like everyone here says answer one question why let the finances get worse and wait till next year they would want to take on less debt as possible would also not make sense to wait. Also would make a pledge to prove interest by trying to keep a good squad by keeping likes of Marty smith rather than watch club sell its good assets and it would cost more to rebuild. So tell us when I have made fair comment that sees not just me that does not believe club any more give your so called answer to why an invester would see club get worse as dragons den would say I am out

If I could actually understand a word of that gibberish I might attempt to answer

The question in plain English an invester would want to take on as little debt as possible and would show it's serious buy putting an offer in so why would an invester let you sell Marty smith if the invester was interested why would he or them stand by and let club take a fall on players. Why would a new so called owner let players that played well for us let a club sell them. Would not want to completely rebuild and sell players that did good job for us so why wait and take on more debt? And if a deal was done why not just come out and say it tells me it's not concrete and in stone so like I say believe it when it's announced.