Thats a rather long winded way of saying nowhere

You didn't answer the question properly, dont know if you mis-read the question or ignored it. Will you support teams from PNG or Perth being the next teams into the NRL?

Most of NSW and Queensland is the answer. RU is biggest in ACT and AFL is biggest in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia. Northern Territory is close between RL and AFL

Worse than that, Tasmania has no rugby league played there at all, not even at an amateur level.



I know that Tasmania isn't the most significant place on the planet but even so, if league has pretensions to be the "national sport of Australia", it is pretty poor that one state has no rugby league at all.

But the biggest two media outlets do.

I dont know an awful lot about their state but I get the impression League shouldnt stand still and become stale over there

so you were serious then?

maybe youve misread this thread



go back to where i wrote down my views twice.



you guys arent setting any intellectual benchmarks here

All of NSW and all of queensland.



All of ACT too.



not bad. at least one person from the other side of the fence has some idea about RL. maybe you should be the president and spokesperson for the mob

Maybe that will help him. We have a new one now though for the list of hypocrisy...



RL is most dominant in NSW (need more teams) vs RL not very dominant in France (need more teams)

a tasmanian NRL team?









whose going to watch them, all the trees.



the NRL is actually an international competition.

53% of australias population resides in nsw and queensland.

47% of our population lives in the rest.



demographic trends show queensland has the highest population growth rate and will overtake victoria within 2 decades in terms of population



in terms of advertising dollars on TV, RL areas comprise 65% of the total advertising spent, whilst the rest generates the residual.

As is Super Legaue