Evidently, there wasn't.



If there was a camera shot which ''clearly showed the ball grounded'' over the line, then it would have been given a try.



Not everything's a conspiracy.

If the ball was four feet long then maybe it would have been a try.

There was! From the front on angle! A ball cant lose 2 inches of length therefore it must have been grounded. I think your coach agreed

Exactly. There was a camera angle which at least looked like the ball was down. It was a classic case of benefit of the doubt for me and Maguire knew it was a try himself.



The obstruction issue is mighty annoying. They change their mind week in week out on obstruction and it's not a hard rule to call on.

The ball was clearly grounded.



I know this because Tuson has the ability to remove his legs below the knee.

I saw that too. Sky only showed that angle once. It seemed the most conclusive of all. Makes you wonder if they are tyring to find a reason NOT to give a try.



Solomona knows he got the ball down V Wigan at the HJ last year, no benefit of the doubt there either. Is there a common denominator

Alas, unfortunately he dropped it instead of placing it down.



Even Tony Smith said in his post match interview that Solomona was gutted in the dressing room as he felt he's cost the team the win by knocking on - ''Warrington Coach Tony Smith: "He (David Solomona) is distraught in there, saying sorry to all his team-mates. But it's not all down to him and he'll score plenty this year. It's fine-line stuff sometimes, we were within a centimetre or two of snatching the victory.''

Another anti Wigan topic. Absoulutely OBSESSED.

Another Wiganer who thinks everyone else is anti-Wigan.



Classic Goons.

Read the OP.

Already have thanks.



So who's obsessed? MrPhilB? As far as I can see he's started a grand sum total of one thread about Wigan on the front page of this board.



Making things up to suit their own paranoid agenda.



Classic Goons.

Talking rollocks.



Classic whinos