Yep, I agree with all that and have been saying it for ages.



However, to negate that, we have to have a set-up in place which enables us to take advantage if the Aussies (and to a lesser extent the Kiwis) have an off day against us. We can't match their quality but, in my opinion under David Waite (and to a lesser extent Noble until it all unravelled in the last tri-nations) we had an identifiable playing structure, whether we liked the style of it or not, which meant we were usually more competitive than we have been in this tournament, where Smith seems to have instilled nothing of the sort into his players - I can't think of any sort of gameplan that has been apparent in any of the matches.



Like I say I agree we don't have the quality, but that doesn't excuse the way we have played for most of this World Cup, being free and fluid might sound, and look, good when it comes off but when the opposition is significantly stronger that won't happen, it might work for him at Wire in 2010 but thats a different ball game altogether.

Which we and you would think T Smith already knew before we went out there



So you then have to come up with game plans and tactics to make you competitive



This he has completely failed to do



Clueless

Not a bad coach? Give over. He drops the only guy who has given us some direction in Sinfield, for a loser like Rob Purdham. Keeps faith with a fullback who in every game has been nothing short of abysmal and leaves Lee Smith out. Makes some absoultely stupid decisions last week against NZ, which cost us the game, which gave NZ the mental advantage in this game. Then he leaves out JJB/Hock for wilkin, who, although wasnt that bad this game, has been shocking the whole tournament.



He is as bad a coach I have seen for a long time.

Yep - I do agree with you, but as to the game plan and playing structure, I'm not sure - we've seen and heard players in the past put their hands up and admit that the coach told them what to do but the players just didn't produce it on the field (oddly this happens a lot at Warrington, and it's usually Briers who owns up to it, too), so I'd be interested to see some of the English players interviews that should be coming up over the next week or two.



As far as working for him at wire ....

That's the style they already play from the Cullen era, and it's very much confidence based (and relies a lot on defences falling apart too!), which can see big winning runs, followed by big losing runs - I'd quite welcome a bit of structure and control in Warrington's game plan for the coming season! Hopefully Lowes' thoughts on RL are more akin to Brian Smith's style from when he was at Bradford!

Yes he should, that line up he put out today was bordering on the riddiculous. You have only 1 prop for the bench so what does the muppet go and do? He goes and sticks a stand off on the bench when he already has a hooker there! Utterly clueless, even Millward wouldnt do such a thing.

The fact you think Sinfield provided anything approaching a sense of direction while he was on the field for England instantly loses you all credibility. You need to let go of the notion that the England squad was capable of winning this tournament, once you accept that we simply don't have the right quality of players you'll be able to look at this from a much more level headed perspective.

Sinfield has offered us more direction than any other player. So I assume, you think leaving Purdham who looked so far out of his depth, he wouldnt have got a game for scotland, for Sinfield was the correct decision. Oh, and please could you show me where I said I thought this squad of england players could win the world cup. Cheers.

shaun edwards to replace smith!

If smith wanted his loose forward to ... you know .... play like a loose forward, and muscle in with the forward pack to gain yards (which admittedly I'm afraid didn't happen), then yes, it was the correct choice.



Sinfield has what I like to refer to as Andy Farrell syndrome, stick him in a 13 jumper and he seems to think that makes him chief playmaker, it takes out a huge amount of go forward - Farrell did eventually calm down and start playing like a forward though, and when Wigan moved him to prop for his last couple of seasons he was a revelation, absolutely superb - I'm not convinced that Sinfield has the ability or strength to fulfil that role when what his team needs is the ability to gain field position.



If Sinfield wants to make a career out of being a play maker, then he needs to move out of the pack in to the halves, and let someone else who can gain ground in the tackle or god forbid even bust a tackle get the 13 shirt.







Well, given that you seem to think a "better" coach could have produced a different result for England you quite obviously do think the players are capable with "the right man" in charge.

Im still waiting for you to show me where I said we could win the world cup. I never said this. I believe with a different coach we have done better in all our matches. So over to you mate, to show me where i said we could win the world cup, like you claimed.

And by better do you mean we could have won them?



I've got an interesting one - if we'd still lost all three of those games but by less, I predict you'd still be saying "we could have done better".