Quote Gerrum on side ref="Gerrum on side ref"FFS why don't the pair of you use the PM option, totally derailed thread......'"
OMG another one. What - specifically discussing an approach to Brian Noble to coach the Bulls, on a Bulls forum, in a thread called "Brian Noble" is derailing it? On which planet?
But congratulations on your appointment as a moderator.
Quote Gerrum on side ref="slideby"you still dont have a 'quote' from BN saying that he was approached on Monday....
Dont get me wrong, there may be one, he may say it, but I havent seen it yet. If he does say this, then I will then most likely call him a liar.'"
The facts are plainly stated in the quotes. It is your fault you can't follow them, though I very much doubt you can't. Nevertheless I'll take a final stab:
1. The administrator phoned Noble
2. Noble confirmed he
immediately approached Cummins.
=#0000FF(you need to concentrate on the word "immediately. The reasons will become clear)
3. We have confirmation from Potter and from Cummins that that phone message (Noble to Cummins) was on the Monday. Therefore, the administrator phoned Noble on the Monday.
=#4000FF(Otherwise Noble would be lying when he claimed he "immediately" phoned Cummins;. "Immediately" is not a word that can be misconstrued. Are you with me so far?)
4. Noble said he "[ileft him {Cummins} a message and then he left me a message back saying that, with everything that had happened, he didn't think he could do it. We did speak later in the night and that's the way it was left, but by that stage they'd had the supporters' meeting[/i."
"We did speak later in the night" can
ONLY mean the night of the same day the message was left. It certainly can't mean "we did speak one night the following week". And it was the same day as the night of the supporters' meeting. That is, MONDAY. Not any day last week.
QED
Now, that is all
crystal clear, to anyone who wants to understand it. Do you?