Things is he's not had anywhere near 70 first teams games when you look at the number of mins he's been on the field. I often wonder what the point is of having on the field for a couple of 15min stints while Lynch and Scruton run themselves into the ground. It doesn't serve anyone.



It's not surprising that given more gametime he's improved, but this has been a side effect of having to do without Lynch and Scruton due to injury. It's not been part of a some masterplan.



It must be hard for front rowers to get into the game when they're constantly on and off the field but a young kid who's only getting short stints is going to take a lot longer to learn and develop.

I'm still not convinced by Koppy despite a couple of good games in the last few weeks. He'd need to play well to the end of the year to earn a new deal IMO.

I am completely convinced by Kopczak. I am completely convinced that he ain't very good.

but our super coach only gives him 10min spells... more game time and I am sure he would improve.

The same does not apply to Worlord - he is just not very good (trying to be polite)

Think we were spoiled with the awesome foursome. The sight of Fielden and Baloo on the touch line must have crushed some of the opposition!

I bet Worrincy's had something like double the amount of mins of the pitch compared to Kopczak.



I do think we need to see him get more game time before making a final decision. That said he does need to pull his finger out and show a bit more oomph in the remaining games. One can be forgiven for thinking Koppy has a touch of the "Chris Feathers" about him.

Deleted for harmony's sake

Give the lad a break 22 years old is young for a prop. He`s shown good improvement with more game time.

FWIW I agreed I with you.

Agreed

Shame he's 23 then