It's only a matter time before the T&A starts portraying Hood with red eyes and horns.

New Caisley, New Danger?

The T&A is a propghanda paper. Gerbles owns it im sure. Muslim bias tis

And suddenly I'm on the T&A's side.

Surgical Spirit that's it! That's where I remember him from.



IF (and I'm not suggesting this is) this were some sort of publicity stunt by one of the shareholders looking take back control of the board it would be a pretty poor effort TBH. So this quite clearly isn't. Mr Preston's heart felt comments leave me feeling sad but with a warm affection for him at the same time. To see his beloved home City going to rack and ruin (cheers for the positive outlook mate) must be tearing him apart. I'm sure he'll be doing his all to help out the club by paying for his hospitality tickets everytime he turns up at Odsal.

Surgical spirit?



That freeloader needs something big and sharp surgically implanting up his 'arris, to stop all that gobshìte pouring out.

Preston's just about well known enough that any local newspaper would print his comments on a subject affecting a local sports club. They're not going to ignore him are they? If people like Preston, Caisley, Galloway etc want to comment on the Bulls, the T&A will print it.



It may be that the club is being slow to communicate its side of the argument. But its also likely that they're not able to maintain a running commentary on any discussions that are taking place. That leaves them open to criticism but such is life.

Stop fretting about Preston. He's an "ACTOOOOOOOOR" with a sticky out little finger when drinking his red, eating his lunch and freeloading, for many years, on the Bulls' hospitality. What on earth would he know about managing a business and transparency when he uses other peoples words for a living

Does he mean the Sunderland manager? That's the best wind up attempt ever or I've misread it surely? I mean I'd prefer Harry Redknapp we all would or even Mourinho? But in our situation we'd have to take what we can.



If that came off I'd have to cut down on the old Cherry Brandy and Macaroons.

And all this time I was thinking he was the bloke from Dragons Den.

Why would the T and A be biased against the current board?



There's a Salem-esque element going on here where anyone not wholly uncritical of the board or giving space to any other take, is a 'proxy for Caisley' or has an 'agenda'. By agenda we mean secretly wishing to destroy the club. To claim the T and A which has given this board a free ride for years in my view has an agenda against them is absurd.

If there's an opportunity to kick the T&A in the nads I'm taking it.