that's rich coming from a team that got beat at home by wigan 44---10

so it seems that even though our young halves aint all that convincing,they must be better than your's...









ps..have you won a game yet?

="tigertot.. I'm not convined by any of their other young halves yet either. How the hell they drew with Wigan is beyond me.'"

Sam Burgess

In fairness to Hood he would say Sam wasnt going anywhere and then an offer is made that the Bulls think they cant refuse and he goes. They would say they wernt actively looking to sell him.



No different to me having no intention of selling my house, then someone knocks on my door and offers 3 times the value, I aint gonna say no then am I?

Bulls didnt get anywhere near 3x the value for Burgess.



If Westerman went for 300k, how much do you think Burgess should have been vauled, and how much do you think we got for him. According to some on here it was around 100k. Is that an offer they cant refuse or a pittance of what they should have recieved?

The Bulls received $1m Australian for Sam!

I once painted my balls blue in art aswell. No, really.

Do we [iactually[/i want Pryce?



A few weeks ago we were all saying that we were really happy with Briggs and Herbert. OK, injured at the moment - but then so is Pryce. By the time we get Pryce in and match fit, Herbert and (probably) Briggs will be back.



And, let's be honest, Pryce isn't going to want to be back up is he

Loose forward pryce maybe?

When fit and on form Pryce is devastating. He is a top class Super League player, and we should be interesed in quality players.

If we did receive £100k for Sam i reckon that was a good deal as he would have left for £100k less at the end of the season. Is this not old ground?

We'd have also had a world class player playing for us for another season who could have made a difference to our overall position and performances.

Yeah, we might have finished ninth!!