Taking longer than expected due to Mr Caisley's meticulous dissecting of everything.



It's only right that we allow Chris, Rolland & Stephen as much time as necessary, to paint an accurate picture of the clubs current and future outlook, to the people interested in investing in our great club.

So there really ARE people seriously interested in "investing"? Maybe that light isn't the train after all.



I think speculation as to the potential investors' identities should start now.

Source Mick?



I speculate that it is not just conjecture.

would be nice to know who they are in talks with. dont care how long it takes though as long as they save the club and dont sell quality players. we have t give them time though.

Seems to me they have had enough time to look a the books. Either the business is viable or not. Time to get this sorted I think.

Certainly not conjecture on my behalf.



The information between Blake Solly (RFL) and his communication with Mr Caisley, is out there in the Public Domain mate.

I suspect the answer may currently be somewhere in between - it is viable, at least until the next licensing round, provided we accept permanent mediocrity due to having far less money than those clubs we would aspire to compete with.



Without a sugar daddy, that would have been the case for most of those latter clubs too. We continue to be stuck in an old stadium with no sugar daddy, unless the reviewers can find a solution to both, or find some new third way that has not yet been tried. I suspect such a "third way" would have to involve serious fan involvement and ownership, which was in the minds of the previous BoD. Whether the new, and I suspect interim, BoD concludes and is prepared to consider likewise is to me a key question.

No news is good news.



Or something.

Said the first turkey to the second turkey, in late November...

I suspect we'll all find out next Monday what the plan is for taking the club forward.

Correct me if I'm wrong but if we gained a current grade B license, then in the next round the lowest we can get is grade C? I recall reading this somewhere last sunmmer but can't find ought to back it up

What if we were graded "C" and there were more applicants ahead of us graded A or B, or graded C with more points than us, than there were Licences available?

With it being a matchday then I would imagine that would depend on how positive the news is, if the news isn't that great then tuesday is more likely.

Is that a direct change/update from taking longer than expected because the problems "were worse than expected" or is it an extra reason?