He's already been. Several times.

Or that Wigan, with undoutedly the pacier backs, would benefit most from a dry track. You're getting very touchy FTV. Twitchy a*rse by any chance?

Not twitchy at all. I just don't think we've reached the point where we worry about the weather forecast when we play Wigan yet.





If you think Saints ever hope for rain rather than dry tracks, regardless of opposition, you've obviously not watched us play very much.

Wow! Massive turn around in opinion of you Saints fans after the win against Warrington.

Warrington were very unlucky they did not have a recognised kicker, they dominated territory and possession in the game, if they were 50% clinical in taking their chances they would have won the game, but they were poor in attack, and still scored 4 tries! I attended the game and Warrington made you look very very average for large parts of the game. We shall see.

I'm assuming this was after us leading 20-6 mid way through the second half . . . . .

The first half you got away with it and you know it

and bradford made you look e for half of the game netween you two

I think the only way we could have got away with it more is if Wire had dropped the ball over the line with a match winning try begging.

Well you are pretty poor in the rain, so I'll concede the point!







(yeah, I know we are too, before you say it!

)

I'm not denying that, we've acknowledged that and bounced back with two fairly comfortable wins. All I was saying is that if Warrington had any structure to their attack in the game on Friday they would have beaten you IMO. Same happened with Wigan at the HJ, they dominated possession and territory but could not score enough points. Wigan and Saints have both been lucky against Warrington this year IMO.

By the way, I'm sure you said you couldn't make it to the match on Friday, so how would you know how the game went?

were we both lucky, or can they just not rise to the better teams? FTV has noted that the only decent side they have beaten all year is Hudds.