I agree, most of the team were better than him.

Nob ed.

Not really....Saints had 15 men all game. Thaler and Ganson might have well have worn saints shirts!! Ganson made me laugh at the end.....looking every which way he could possibly allow a try even though it was academic, before finally conceeding that even he couldnt possibly justify it!!

would have been interesting if that would have been for the game though....ganson would have probably risked his neck and given it!

Long didn't play well at all IMO. Wellens should have got MoM.

Wellens or pryce was my man of match.



Sean long did ok but was never the best player on the pitch.

Whilst the ref gave us a few decisions, a 42-8 scoreline doesn't suggest it made a big difference to the outcome.

As a "neutral" I'd have gone for Wellens or Pryce.



Paul Clough also played well.

Didn't I tell you about him 3 years ago?

Pryce MOM for me, he was very good as was Meli IMO.

I think wellens just pipped pryce but both was very good.



Good to see wellens beating men again.

roby MOM for me he did so many good rounds and set alot up

We seem to flow better in attack when roby comes on and he gives us a big lift.



We seem to start games very flat and slow.



Would it be good idea to try roby from the off?



I just think it might help us start better but would maybe lose roby's impact off the bench.

at some of the rot from oter supporters on this thread.



A team gets smashed 42 - 8 and the ref won it for us. Genius





Go and give your head a shake, lads.

Pryce was the stand out player for me, always is, him and wilkin are realy the glue that is currently keeping st. helens together.



Graham has lost it IMO, not the player we've seen in past seasons



And i still don't know why you even let long near a kicking tee.

When the penalty count was 11-5 (from memory) yes, the ref helped you ALOT



there was odd good try from pryce or wellens, but sorry mate your obv. blind to it!