Quote rhinoms="rhinoms"Not seen much of him tbh but he'd be wortha punt if he could get a visa.'" 'tough hombre' www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/06/ ... x402,0.jpg

Quote rhinoms="rhinoms"Not seen much of him tbh but he'd be wortha punt if he could get a visa.'" 'tough hombre' www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/06/ ... x402,0.jpg

Webb's done from what I've seen. If Mason could knuckle down then he'd be good. Unfortunately he's a complete idiot.

You're right, he's exactly the type of player we need on the pitch but Mason is an egotistical idiot who'd bring more disruption to the club than stability.



All he's after is a healthy pay cheque and couldn't give a flying fook which team employs his services.



I'd rather not have him in SL TBH let alone Leeds.

Between the Rhinos and the Bulls so i'm told.



In all honesty anyone who signs Mason deserve all they get.

I think I'd prefer to see what Ambler and Burgess have in them for next season under guidance from a recovering Peacock.



Noticed that Burgess seemed to be tied to Peacock all Saturday, don't think he was even allowed to take his hands out of his pockets without permission. If we can extract Peacocks ability into these two and rotate them next year so they are fighting against each other for a place, think we could have some decent go-forward.

Don't want him, doubt Peacock will either.

You might be wrong with that. Personally I would think Peacock would be glad with anybody who will take on the workload to assist him. Is Mason that player? I am undecided, but I think Fielden might have been the sort option that would suit Peacock the best.

Peacock needs a fellow grafter so he can be properly interchanged. He shouldn't be needing to do 60-70 minutes just because his fellow props only last for 10 minute spells.



Having said that, given that we're going to lose Eastwood, I also think we need another really dynamic runner in the pack, as whilst you wouldn't want to bank everything on Peacock's fitness, you'd want to put even less on Ali being fit for long spells.



I think one other thing Saturday showed is that we are severely lacking punch from the back row as well as the front. Clarkson, JJB and Ablett are solid players, but not one of them causes a defence problems unless they hit a gap.

We need 2 forwards for me. 1 to replace Eastwood, 2 another prop to take some workload off JP, preferably a good hard yards gainer. Fielden would do nicely imo.

Deffo going to need another meter gaining prop. Peacock isnt going to be straight back to superman mode when he returns. IMO of course.

Not sure if Mason would be a good signing. Leeds badly need another big forward who can make yards, and Mason is certainly a 'big unit'. Unfortunately he also has a big ego, and presumably, big pockets to fill.



I'd rather we went for someone less heralded who just gets the hard work done.

An interesting choice. I seem to recall a lot of wigan fans voicing very similar opinions of Fielden to those which you've expressed about various Leeds players that you suggest should be replaced.