Hahaha get a job.

I already have one, ta.





Is the chemist shut, Stan?

I heard a commentator on TalkSport this morning mention the "four corners of the Globe" and instantly thought about you, Stan.

It must be true then...Baaaaah

Well you can't be very efficient at it, all you do is stalk me with angst cranial insults. Firearms officer yeah right my bullet you are.

You can believe whatever you want, Stan. You plainly do with everything else.

That youtube clip is utter nonsense. You do realise that any scientific theory that has been changed due to new evidence has never been done so by some sad virgin sitting in his basement posting tripe on youtube.

Best thing about that video is Rowdy Roddy Piper around 4 and half minutes! Oh, and Henning Wehn doing the voice over.

Dear Mr Stanley, or can I call you Flat?

I'm confused.

On Wednesday morning I'm going to Central Sulawesi to witness the 'total solar eclipse'. [urlhttp://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/in/indonesia/palu[/url I've heard some stories about this phenomenon and how they know exactly where and when they are visible but these seem to rely on calculations based on the false science and their model of the 'solar system'.

I'd like to know how it really works. How can millions of people see it exactly as predicted. Where I live in South Sulawesi they say there will be only 90% coverage. Which is why I'm driving 14 hours to a suitable viewing position.

I guess it's something to do with NASA, but how they do it? Particularly over such a wide area and perfectly choreographed and timed to perfection. This must have been even more difficult to achieve in the millions of years before computers and NASA existed. I guess they could have faked the photos and bribed the billions of eye witnesses who are still alive?[urlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_July_28,_1851[/url .

Please explain.

Thanks

Coco

Hmmm. Unlike your technique of swallowing whole whatever your delusional mates publish, I considered that video.



Obviously it's a fake, because he's forgotten to put in the stars. CGI bullcrap. Etc.







Sorry, just winding you up, although the reasons no stars are visible in his video is the same as why no stars are seen in The Blue Marble, or in moon photographs.



1. It proves the Earth is a globe, since you tell us that however high we go, our eyes are always level with the horizon - yet at only 73 miles, the view of the curve of the globe is abundantly clear

2. If the Earth were flat then the whole of the flat Earth should be visibletrailing away in all directions. It's not. The local area and some distance in all directions from it can be seen, but no further than that. Exactly what you'd expect, as you go higher, you can see further around the curve of the globe, but still you can't see that far, as the curve of the globe drops away over all horizons.

3. The idiot who made the video thinks that the ground position of the moon (i.e., the place on Earth where the moon would appear directly overhead) means you can only see the moon from there. In fact, the moon is approx a quarter of a million miles away and as such at any given time can be seen from not far off half the Earth.



4. Here's a screenshot of the view of the sky from the approximate launch location, on the date in question, at approximately the time he says the rocket was launched, and from an altitude of 120km. I used the fantastic free resource Stellarium.







What's that thing I see in the south east, easily visible above the horizon? Well, I never. It's the Moon.



Oddly enough, in just the same direction, from the perspective of the launch site, as the "moon dot" on your idiot mate's map.



Epic fail Stan, although not your fault, save for being so gullible; you just uncritically wanted to believe your idiot mate, but it turns out that he has no idea what he is talking about.



HTH

Prescription must have been sorted this week...