Come on Stan, your audience awaits!





Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

[i

Quote Ferocious Aardvark="Ferocious Aardvark"Come on Stan, your audience awaits! Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

'"

Awe you're becoming more of an embarrassment with every post. It looks like a tree trunk simulated to look like a bone. Now hrere's that very supposed bone which is a replica as mentioned in tht Telegraph article. Hahaha they even tell you in plain sight it's a replica. Poor Aardvark falls for it every-time its hilarious.

[/i



[i[size=150Sir David Attenborough with a =#BF0000replica of the titanosaur's femur Photo: BBC[/size[/i

So you have (as usual) no answers to my last set of points. Quelle surprise!



Sticking with fossils, do try to catch the documentary Stan - you can watch the actual fossil being actually dug up, then encased in protective coating, transported, and in the lab. You'll also see how and why they make replicas.



Though why you would think there is something odd or sinister in a person photographing a replica and saying: "Here's a replica" is a mystery!



Here ya go - originals partly excavated, still on site, where the dinosaur died. Not replicas.

Ironically, you've just summarized the basic requirement for the devout, regardless of which brand of imaginary friend they believe in; blind faith, with no facts, evidence or proof to back up any of the crazy claims they depend on.

[iHahaha still unemployed butch...Awe poor lad

[/i

Why do you keep saying I'm unemployed? You don't know anything about me except what I've chosen to tell you. Seems a poor way of brushing off anything Bren writes, and a weird dig at me seeing as I actually told you what I was employed as. You see, it's quite easy to keep tabs on a forum throughout the day because science has made it possible to carry around a personal pc in your pocket, so that whatever you need is only a button press away. Somewhat ironic that the sum total of human knowledge is even at your fingertips, yet you choose to use it to further a life of fantasy and mental illness.

Do you have any evidence that this is factually incorrect? No.





Er, not even remotely the case. Not within a seven day camel ride of the facts. I mean, given that most people understand at least the basics of sedimentary layers, how they form, and how they are moved to the surface by tectonic activity, I'd suggest you developed at least a basic understanding of the first principles before making moronic comments.





Look, if a dinosaur died in one spot then it would be plainly obvious, even to the average cretin, that, being dead, its remains would broadly speaking remain around that spot. If for example its femur is in Patagonia, where would you expect its tibia to be - Poland?



Whenever any bodily remains are discovered, it is not astonishing that by carefully excavating the immediate spot, you'll find most of the remaining bones. You would have to be a moron not to get that.





Is it? What about this moron-level idea for displaying an anything

1. Dismantle and pack

2. Take somewhere else

3. Re-assemble and display.



Only a moron would fail to understand something so totally simple.







Your number skills are a bit off, but making allowance for your moronicity I suppose I should give due credit that you got the 1 before the zeros. But, what is the reason why a bone of a dead anything might not be sticking out of the ground? Lots of things stick out of the ground, often exposed when erosion takes place - you know, wind, water, that sort of stuff. The mere fact of something sticking out of the ground is not a valid objection. It is you who oozes bull.



PS It would be "carcass", and it wasn't, it was a fossilised bone.

Which seems entirely plausible when pitted against, say, a lone shepherd being spoken to by god through the medium of a burning bush...

Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet.



I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?

Quote bandgeekmafia78="bandgeekmafia78"Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet. I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?'" Yep. Take his last post for example on Dinosaur bones: Quote bandgeekmafia78="FLAT STANLEY""David "Eugenics pioneer of bull Sir Freemasoic Attenborough" has recently been in a BBC documentary called 'Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur' which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims. It starts with the romantic story of a lone Patagonian farmer looking for a lost sheep and chances upon the largest bone ever found just sticking out of the ground. Apparently this bone has been buried for around 100 million years under a few inches of dirt! A team is assembled and cameras are all over it. But you only see them digging and chipping at rock. Not once do you see a bone being uncovered for the first time. You only see them after they have been completely excavated/put in place. By digging a few feet down they manage to find 200 bones belonging to a Totalbullasaur (Sorry, Titanosaur). Then the show ends with them assembling and welding together the 120ft long dinosaur in a warehouse. How they plan to get it out of there and on display is a total mystery to me. But too many people just eat this crap up. To me it looks like carved rock. As if a 1000.000 year old carcous is going to be stuck out the ground like a sore thumb just oozes bull.'" This was copy and pasted from here; ifers.ace.st/t56-dinosaur-hoax-d ... er-existed Scroll down towards the bottom to a post from someone called 'Paranoid Gramdroid'. It's pretty much word for word, except Stanley has replaced certain bits of wording, such as; "which I had the misfortune of watching the end of whilst round at a friends house. Today I downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims", to; "which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims". Pretty sad really. I caught Alice at it the other day too, who has mysteriously vanished.

Quote bandgeekmafia78="bandgeekmafia78"Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet. I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?'" Yep. Take his last post for example on Dinosaur bones: Quote bandgeekmafia78="FLAT STANLEY""David "Eugenics pioneer of bull Sir Freemasoic Attenborough" has recently been in a BBC documentary called 'Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur' which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims. It starts with the romantic story of a lone Patagonian farmer looking for a lost sheep and chances upon the largest bone ever found just sticking out of the ground. Apparently this bone has been buried for around 100 million years under a few inches of dirt! A team is assembled and cameras are all over it. But you only see them digging and chipping at rock. Not once do you see a bone being uncovered for the first time. You only see them after they have been completely excavated/put in place. By digging a few feet down they manage to find 200 bones belonging to a Totalbullasaur (Sorry, Titanosaur). Then the show ends with them assembling and welding together the 120ft long dinosaur in a warehouse. How they plan to get it out of there and on display is a total mystery to me. But too many people just eat this crap up. To me it looks like carved rock. As if a 1000.000 year old carcous is going to be stuck out the ground like a sore thumb just oozes bull.'" This was copy and pasted from here; ifers.ace.st/t56-dinosaur-hoax-d ... er-existed Scroll down towards the bottom to a post from someone called 'Paranoid Gramdroid'. It's pretty much word for word, except Stanley has replaced certain bits of wording, such as; "which I had the misfortune of watching the end of whilst round at a friends house. Today I downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims", to; "which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims". Pretty sad really. I caught Alice at it the other day too, who has mysteriously vanished.

He/She/It will be back as soon as Stan forgets to take the meds.