Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"[i
And you surely can't believe humans existed from 200,000 years ago? '"
Believe? There you go again. you're the one who believes stuff, both in absence of evidence, and also despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. That "belief" in the face of anything and everything is your problem.
There's acres of evidence freely available from hundreds of sources if not thousands, it is consistent, and the essential timelines are supported by all this scientific research. Therefore it is reasonable to proceed on the basis that the hypothesis is correct. That being that the first common male ancestor of all modern humans lived around 200,000 - 250,000 years ago. The first common female ancestor lived around 100,000 - 200,000 years ago. So yes, I see no reason to doubt the general approximation of 200,000 years. To do so, I'd have to think that all the eminent scientists who have been responsible for this extensive work are all wrong, or all deliberately lying. And that's what YOU "believe". You've not a scrap of evidence that this is the case, absent maybe some link to some screwball delusional YouTube nutcase, but your "beliefs" tell you it wasn't so, and that is why you ignore the hard evidence and won't even consider it.
And so instead you pretend it doesn't exist.
Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"You are just believing fairytale stories. '"
See, there you go again! I'm the one who has tonnes of hard factual scientific evidence behind me. You have nothing, unless you count an old book of fairytales. So it is YOU who prefers to believe fairytal stories. just admit it to yourself.
Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"Look at all that incessant rant you went on, and it's all 'logic' stories without one piece of evidence. '"
I didn't and don't rant. I confront you with many points, and you always find a way to avoid them. Because you have no answers, you are in denial.
Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"How could you document the moment you ask? Why not document even one piece of transformation? Nothing. You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago yet not one skeleton to prove any such in-between to prove the wild claims made about evolution? '"
I would be utterly pointless as even if they found a billion skeletons you would never accept one single piece of evidence, so why are you wasting our time with this ludicrous objection?
Second, you are the one who claims that "they" consistently "fake" everything, all the time, from aeropkane flights, to moon landings, to a round Earth, satellites. whatever, it is all CGI and fakery. But if "they" were doing that, then WHY WOULDN'T THEY INDEED HAVE PRODUCED EVERY MISSING LINK SKELETON THAT YOU CLAIM IS MISSING? Come on, Stan, THINK ABOUT THAT.
Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"Exactly what I said would happen with you,'"
What was that, then?
Quote FLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY" and I am right that evolution is the easiest of the hoaxes to expose.'"
Actually evolution is the easiest to prove Stan. It happens all the time, everywhere around you.
But you are dead to reason. I am not a scientist, but I cite as one example of a true genius in his field, the dedicated and tireless geneticist Prof. Lenski. The exchanges between him and one Andy Schlafly are so typical of the exchanges between you and you ilk, rude, bombastic, sneering and oblivious to reason, and patient and helpful responders who despite your bluster and rudeness still afford relatively polite and thoroughly reasoned responses to sometimes ludicrous questions and points.
The exchange of letters is so typical of exchanges between you and non-delusional people that you could learn a lot from it. But I mainly cite it as one simple (and incontrovertible) example of evolution concretely and irrefutably seen in abundant action. Yes! EVOLUTION, Stan! If you read the letters it explains it all. E-coli bacteria were used in the study, and because they multiply so quickly, their evolution can easily be studied within a human timeframe. And Prof. Lenski has the evolved strains, as well as the original strains, available for any genuine researcher. Only an utter moron would "not believe in" evolution when it has been so comprehensively shown in living action.
Enjoy!
[urlhttp://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog[/url
PS yes, I know you'll say Lenski is a Freemasonic Satanist and all his alleged research never happened, it's all fake etc. but HE HAS THE LIVING PROOF so please don't even bother
