Nope, but it did cause it, easy way to stop it is prevent the taking of the photographs, their school, their rules.







They have plenty of choices, I've witnessed first hand an A&B lunch service and the blog was in no way a reflection on what they do.







Sadly, yes they do. And more fool the parents that pander to them.

Who'd have thought it - members of a local authority, those bastions of public service, acting like that?

Look at the photo that's ridicule enough. At the end of the day, people in government and local aithorities are responsible for making decisions that allow that to be served up. They should ALL be ridiculed and hounded out of office. It's disgusting and those same people will be wasting money on nonsense like awarding schools (probably including that one! a "healthy eating award" and also hectoring the public about their poor eating habits that costs the NHS billions....



What all these idiots lack is an ounce of decency and common-sense.

Quote Big Graeme="Big Graeme"... They have plenty of choices, I've witnessed first hand an A&B lunch service and the blog was in no way a reflection on what they do.'" I was meaning more the question of when was it decided that children should have a vast range of choices. We didn't. And it is hardly a universal. www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/what-sch ... tries-arou karenlebillon.com/2012/05/04/lee ... f-annonay/ idlewords.com/2003/03/french_wee ... unches.htm grist.org/article/food-2010-10-1 ... as.twitter www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... d=tweetbut Vast amounts of choice is not necessarily a good thing. I suspect that the entire marketisation of everything in the UK, and the idea of pupils as 'customers', has meant that councils now believe that they have to offer loads of different food – and certainly what the blog did show was hardly what you'd call appetising, never mind particularly healthy.

Quote Big Graeme="Big Graeme"... They have plenty of choices, I've witnessed first hand an A&B lunch service and the blog was in no way a reflection on what they do.'" I was meaning more the question of when was it decided that children should have a vast range of choices. We didn't. And it is hardly a universal. www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/what-sch ... tries-arou karenlebillon.com/2012/05/04/lee ... f-annonay/ idlewords.com/2003/03/french_wee ... unches.htm grist.org/article/food-2010-10-1 ... as.twitter www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... d=tweetbut Vast amounts of choice is not necessarily a good thing. I suspect that the entire marketisation of everything in the UK, and the idea of pupils as 'customers', has meant that councils now believe that they have to offer loads of different food – and certainly what the blog did show was hardly what you'd call appetising, never mind particularly healthy.

Oh, I think we should start with you and yet another illiterate sentence. But then if we did, you'd doubtless whinge and whine about 'bullying'.







Oh – so you actually WANT to bully some people. Dally the two-faced, eh – who'd a thunk it?







[url=http://favicoop.com/wp-content/uploads/Mirror_Picture.jpgHere's something for you.[/url

As I guessed: www.ljc.ea.argyll-bute.sch.uk/in ... y-hub.html Compare the tick-box, image over substance fantasy with the kids picture. Odd isn't it?

As I guessed: www.ljc.ea.argyll-bute.sch.uk/in ... y-hub.html Compare the tick-box, image over substance fantasy with the kids picture. Odd isn't it?

I do not whinge about bullying, just point out that it happens on here and usually derives from those who like to think of themselves as good little liberal minded souls.



But, yes people in public office who self-serve and waste resources on a grand scale with daft schemes should be removed from office either through the ballot box or, where they have executive office, by other means. Why should the public, who elect and pay them to provide a real service, be subjected to such contempt? It's corrupt and farcical. Trouble is most people haven't got the guts to stand up to them and expose them for what they are.



That reminds me, must get back to emailing our highways department over the pointless and hideous road signs they erected recently, have already had to fix twice due to my mocking them, etc and this week, since my last correspondence, have even re-sited one (in a more practical but even more pointless place). £3,000, if I recall, they wasted putting them up and about once a fortnight they have to get the contractors back after I have pointed out their deficiencies. Good to see public money being wisely spent when there are old folks needing care. But, hey, that's a different budget isn't it? That, of course, makes it alright.

What you "point out" is that you do not understand what you're waffling on about.



But it's good to know you want to 'ridicule and hound' people out of their jobs.



Bully.

ban has been lifted, and Dally is a tw@, that's not bullying, THAT IS FACT.

I'm a bit torn on this to be honest. I can see where the school are coming from in trying to protect their employees, but I think it could have been done in a better way. For a start by attacking the utterly rubbish reporting of it in that pathetic excuse for a newspaper rather than the child.



Then, if this girl is showing some initiative in setting up a blog etc then encourage it. Help her with the blog, show her how to set out a basic article, give her a quote for her blog putting the schools side of things. It might be the start of a brilliant journalistic career. Far too often we decry and put down our children's efforts instead of encouraging.



On the other hand quite what a 9 year old girl is doing with a phone (im assuming the pictures were taken off a camera phone) in school, I have no idea.

My word, what a clever little boy / girl we are.

Well bully for me and bully for you.